Now that the inevitable UGM motion pottymouthing Israel has been submitted, the pressing question is of course who will step up to the UGM chair/plate and save the Middle East? Can that guy who looks like Alan from Conferences really be the one to deliver a stable two-state solution? Will that chap who sat next to him all last term decide he can handle a roadmap better than he can take minutes? Someone must guide us through these troubled waters of secret ballots, stamps on the door and irritatingly restricted access.
Shelbod has been spinning like mad saying it'll be a damp squib, uncontested, unnecessary given motions already passed, and a cockthrobbingly narcissistic compassion wank on the part of the motion's first proposer. But then, he would say that wouldn't he.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
Posts
4 comments:
Disgraced? Racist? Pervert? Vicar? How do those adjectives even make sense in describing the Kevster? I'd say you're blundering into the realm of slander here...
On the other hand, if you used "paper-phobe" or mentioned his famous "listen guys" catchphrase, that'd actually make sense.
Dan, stop blogging on this hack website. you are supposed to represent all students!
Can the disgraced racist (disgracist? I shall ask Prince Harry) lookalike pervert vicar really be the one to deliver a stable two-state solution?
Please explain why last years Chair was a pervert or a racist?
Listen guys (thank you), it clearly said 'disgracist lookalike', in reference to the fact he's a spitting image of Kevin Mullan, the King's Union President who got sacked for saying not nice things about black students at King's. I shall post photos to prove it if you like.
Post a Comment