'Tis a shame the post had to be pulled

Any eagle-eyed Hack Attack readers might have noticed a disappearing post over the weekend. The flabbaticals are well touchy about a certain policy, much shouted about at election time, and now apparently top secret.

So top secret in fact, that they decided not to bother telling the Exec about it, and presented a decision to them at the meeting of Union trustees. Cue much wailing and gnashing of teeth.

It is hard to stay on meesage when you're not told what the message is, and as a result, the whole thing is leaking out of every Union orifice imaginable. Ask an Exec member if you really want to know...

In a job, out of a job

Sounds like we're gonna have ourselves a hot n' steamy Comms. race next term.

Bush-hugging, communist beaver diver, Mikhiel Trees is lining himself up, running on a ticket of socialist propaganda. Also, ex-Fuhrer Fart-hil ill baker is attracted by the £26k again (the only people that will employ him now is SU reception) and is looking at a couple of sabb options. He'll probably be just as incompetent, tho at least he might listen to his students...

But wait a minute, SHOCK SHOCK HORROR!!!!!!!, what's that?! A codes of praccy amend to only allow sabbers in the job for ONE TERM? Surely not; it's too unfair on the economy to let those 4 lose into the job market during these rocky times...

That could really fuck up their party.

Hatin' Bacon

So, all you dedicated Hack Attack followers, how many of you is Bacon not talking to at the moment? How many of you are getting yourself in a tizz because he might not have said hello to you in the Quad once? How many of you are convinced that his thinking that we don't need referendums is a personal attack on you? And how many of you answering yes are on the exec?

Having seen a few emails and heard a few conversations, the level of anti-Bacon solidarity on the exec is certainly impressive (stay on message guys...), but there seems a fine line between this and victimisation and bullying. I'm sure the honourable parties involved will stay on the right side of it, and that we can forget this whole petty, spiteful business after Thursday.

SOAS feminists are better than their LSE equalvents...

...at least at creating anti-beauty pageant chants anyway.

At this year's Miss LSE - the wonderful, charity fund-raising event, where ladies who know how to have a bit of fun let their hair down and entertain a welcoming crowd - the anti-beauty contingent had these among their chants:

"Women are sex objects, object!"

"LSE not Misogamy!"

Come on guys and girls, a group of lazy, weed-smoking, hole-in-trouser wearing, poor excuses for students could do better than that. And indeed, SOAS did:

"SOAS is for education,
not for you're ejaculation!"

Quite who was thinking about ejaculating over SOAS, I don't know. But it is a rather good chant.

"Welcom to Imperial - the student experience"

Apparently Imperial's student experience is the same as a Channel 4 'Schools' TV programme from the 90s...